The Property Market In Australia for 2010 | Lake Property and Homes
Welcome. Welcome to Lake Property and Homes. This blog provides daily blog entries which contain articles, news, and other information about lake property and homes. February 2010. M, T, W, T, F, S, S. « Jan … read more…
100 PEACH LAKE Dr, ROMNEY, WV 26757 | MLS# HS7250730
For sale: 3 bed, 2 bath, 1920 sq. ft. house located at 100 PEACH LAKE Dr, ROMNEY, WV 26757 on sale for $295000. MLS# HS7250730. LEAVE THE GRID & GRIDLOCK BEHIND! 20-acre farm near Romney overlooki… … Main Barn Size: 1200.0; Property is on Farm; General Agricultural; Hay Operation; Potential Livestock: Cattle; Potential Livestock: Goats; Potential Livestock: Horses; Potential Livestock: Pigs; Potential Livestock: Poultry; Potential Livestock: Sheep … read more…
Best Article Directory » Real Estate in Brisbane – Is it Time for …
Sandstone lakes is an lake side community which is less than an hour from Brisbane and 4 km from Bribie Island. For best Properties North Brisbane and lakeside properties contact us at devine home. … read more…
From Google Blog Search
Valle de Bravo Real Estate offers Culture and Tradition in the Annual “Festival of Souls”
Valle de Bravo Real Estate offers a relaxing ranch – life style or a the provincial atmosphere of a traditional, small Mexic… read more…
National Trust Properties near Rothbury, Northumberland
There are many worthwhile trust properties near Rothbury, Northumberland, The Cragside house was the former home of famous inventor William, Lord Armstrong. This home has the distinction of being the … read more…
How the Divorce Industry has Neutered the American Male
Men defend their families. Men provide for their families. The roles established by God in the Garden of Eden are well ingrained in the instinct of most men.
There has been a conspiracy to rever… read more…
From GoArticles.com
Resolved Question: If the Real Estate Listing ad was fabricated?
I put a back up offer on a listed home currently with an offer, in the end won the bid. Informed no need to H/O Inspection, (trying to beat current 8K tax credit) altho they extended it, I then could breath and ordered the inspection, glad I did, no foundation, was a converted camp, they advertised it as Central heat/ 1 full bath, econimical heating. it had 3/4 bath. It had no foundation, a kerosene Monitor system (which costs more than oil) and they advertised as having a Corner lot which the corner lot belonged to the neighbor. Found this all out after the Inspection and walk thru. What’s anyone’s advice after I cancelled the Closing meeting in the nick of time. I have $6,000 down – I’ve called the agent out on all the false info already. She wants to pull the Laywer card out on me. They wanted a quick sale and took advantage of a 1st time H.B. – It’s beautiful Lake View, and acces to property. It’s really a camp.
Resolved Question: Renting a home, yet the owner let it go into foreclosure?
Last week, our property manager confirmed that our house was in foreclosure and it’s being auctioned off December 1st. At the beginning of this year we knew that the owner was having trouble, but our property manager said, “everything was fine.” Well now it’s obviously not. Anyone know what might happen? Like do week we have to move out by next week? Right now, is he still the owner? Does the fact that there is supposed to be a written notice 30 days before we have to move out even matter anymore? Do you think we’ll get the deposit back? Etc. Neither the owner or property manager have been the smartest or most truthful people. It’s so sad, this house is big, by the golf course, less then 5mins from the lake, we just can’t believe he let this happen.
What a wonderful way to start the holidays, huh?
Voting Question: What’s your opinion? Is this Perjury and a belligerent attempt to mislead the court?
Please read below for more detials
I recently ended in court to protect a deeded right to ingress and egress to a 10’-0” wide access road that runs from the main road to a lake. Before we went to court the owner of the property the access is on erected a fence and gate on the access.
Access owners Stance 1st Hearing
1)The Access they deeded to me in 1995 went straight over the bank into air and no longer exists.
a)Enter evidence (Deeds) to support their claim
b)Entered into evidence a picture from 1984 showing a small path as the access.
c)They testified that the road that exists now they constructed at a later date to allow them to get appliances to the cottage.
d)Testified that they have parked a car there for over 20+ years therefore they proved adverse possession.
e)Testified that I did ask them not to park in the access
My Stance 1st Hearing
1)I have a clearly state deed to the access. This deeded access was granted to the 2 previous owners of my property. And reaffirmed in 1995 to me with a quick claim deed.
a)Entered deed into evidence
b)Entered a picture of the access from 1994 to show access was present at that time.
c)Testified I requested they quit parking in the access several times.
The Judge’s decision
The Judge ruled against adverse possossion
The Judge stated that their stance that my access no longer existed was simply incredible and ordered that I have the right to the access.
The Judge also ruled they could park a car in the access as long as they were home and they had to move their car within 15 min of my request.
The Judge ordered them to remove the gate and fence.
The Judges ruling did not come until a month after the hearing. In the meantime the neighbors started plowing onto my property to allow them more room to park. We requested they stop. The next thing the neighbor’s attorney requested a meeting with the Judge for clarification of his intent of ruling. Because if the cannot plow my property they have a problem with that and are going to appeal. In the meeting with the Judge he stated his intent was to give both parties free and clear access from the road to the lake. (must have forgot that a car parked in the access is not free and clear). The Judge also stated if the neighbors had to go onto my property 1-2 feet so be it. The Judge said he was open to another hearing to clear this up.
2nd hearing
The attorney for the neighbors now wants to enter into evidence without offering to my counsel for discovery a deed from 1966 and a survey. With the intension that the access was at one time located on the property I now own and the right to use this access was granted to them in this deed. The survey helped to show the location of the access.
Access owners Stance 2nd Hearing
2) Now they have a 1966 deed and survey that they say shows the access was once on the property now owned by me and that deed states they have a right to use my property?
a)Now the access does not go over the bank in fact it was once part of the original property before the neighbors divided off my parcel.
b) Now the survey shows the location of the boat house and its shape. It also shows why my property was divided as irregular and not square. Because the eastern boundary line of my property was the western edge of the access as stated in my deed.
c) Now they testify that the access was topped with railroad ties and
went to the west side of the boat house.
d) They testify they widened the access when they installed the railroad ties for shoring
e) They testify that the bend (dog leg) are in the same place when
looking at a picture from 1994 compared to a picture from 2000.
I also noticed during the hearing the neighbors were able to go thru an assortment of pictures and present them as evidence without presenting them to us as discovery. The Sons Wife who was seated in the Gallery handed the pictures to the Son and Attorney to view right at the table they were sitting at in the court room. They choose the ones the wanted and handed back the others.
Now I am not an attorney however this seems very inappropriate. I feel the Judge should not have allowed the activity in his court room.
Should the judge allowed them to park in the access?
Would this new evidence and testimony by the neighbors at the 2nd Hearing be considered Perjury and a belligerent attempt to mislead the court?
Should the Judge have allowed, condoned, or accepted this behavior in his court room?
Shouldn’t the Trail have been ended right there with a full ruling in my favor?
Do I have a good case to be awarded my attorney fees paid?
Well that didn’t happen. Instead we were ordered to have property surveyed and then have another hearing.
Recently Being Discussed on FriendFeed
Leave a comment